Happy New Year everyone, all the best for 2008.
A lot of love for Apple’s marketing during 2007 recaps, I see.
And I’m OK with people getting down on bended knee to worship at the church of Apple’s marketing, because I think the tactical execution of their iPhone campaign was exceptional.
There was anticipation, secrecy, even frenzy that lead to hundreds of user-generated blogs, news sites, and forums… all full of intrigue. Heck, the mere posting of a picture brought a stampede of hungry prospects large enough to overwhelm the mightiest web server. Amazing.
I salute you, Apple marketing.
What leaves me smiling and shaking my head in wonderment is that few marketers seem to talk about, or acknowledge, the fact that Apple’s iPhone was designed, developed, and then built based upon a powerful strategic product difference that meant… as Sun Tzu might say… the battle was won before it was even engaged.
The real va-va voom was born in the product and not in the marketing.
I mean sure, there were cellphones out there with more features than the iPhone, more powerful devices. But it’s a mistake to suggest because there were/are cellphones on the market with more powerful features than iPhone, that therefore the product itself must’ve played little-to-no part in Apple’s marketing success. Not true at all.
In fact, the iPhone shrugs at such feature “pose downs”, comfortable in the knowledge that it’s all about a very different kind of magic…
What makes the iPhone different? It is the “so easy even your granny can use it” benefit. The “touch the screen with your finger and you’re done” SIMPLICITY. The iPhone was designed, right from the very start, to be the first ever you-never-need-look-at-the-instruction-manual cellphone…
Exactly what the iPod was to MP3 players, you could say.
What I’m talking about here is a clear, unique, and highly desirable strategic product difference that was handed to Apple’s marketing department on a PLATE.
And this didn’t happen by accident. Had to be planned right from the outset. No question.
Don’t believe me? Then how about venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki - who began his career under Steve Jobs at Apple. Guy calls this kind of product differentiation “Elegance,” in his DICEE formula for defining great products and services.
(You can check out his “Art of Innovation” presentation, if you are interested in learning more about the DICEE formula).
The bottom line, though, is that the world is crying out for product solutions that “just work”, and don’t serve-up a new problem, learning experience, or challenge the user needs to overcome before they can enjoy the desired benfit.
Life is hard enough for most of us as it is, after all!
By the way, same principle is behind the success of the Nintendo Wii… it’s not the most powerful system out there, but amazing elegance. Just plug in a game and play. Wave your controller around… simple. Yep, even your granny can do it too.
Here’s the key marketing point:
“The better your product, the more persuasive your marketing can be”.
– Gary Bencivenga (legendary copywriter)
The iPhone is a great product. The iPhone is a great product because it is elegant. The iPhone is elegant because it was designed, developed and then built with this key strategic difference in mind right from the very beginning. A ready-made USP for the marketing department, if you like. Marketing didn’t dream the whole thing up afterwards. The plan didn’t all come together by accident. No, it was all well thought out.
So all marketing had to do was convey the highly desirable unique benefit of elegance, which was born in the product, in the message at the core of their marketing campaign. And they duly did… with great expertise, and no doubt with an even greater smile of their faces.
Take a look:
Go to the iPhone web site and count the number of times the key words “quick, simple, easy, and ‘just tap’” are used in the guided tour (video). You’ll soon run out of finger and toes, and you’ll leave with a clear message ringing in your ears!
Quick, simple, easy. Just tap.
Elegance.
Apple might well be the Tom Brady of marketing, but, at the very least, they’re made to look/perform all the better - put up bigger numbers - by Randy-Moss-like products such as the iPhone.
I think it’s important to remember that.
A final note: I’m going to up my posting frequency this year. And look out for screen-casting and video content coming your way soon (as a compliment to, not as a substitute for, the written word).
Good luck in 2008,
Paul


